Sanctioned crypto exchanges. Names, dates and the official record.
Search documented sanctions designations and EU transaction restrictions involving virtual-asset exchanges, P2P platforms, and related payment-service operators. Each record shows the relevant authority, action date and cited legal entity. A brand match alone does not prove every related business is designated.
Editorial review: · Expanded source-linked historical research; not a live or exhaustive sanctions register
Sanctions involving crypto exchanges and payment platforms
Each row records a dated authority action, including EU transaction restrictions. Multiple entries may relate to the same business under different authorities. Verify the exact named legal entity.
41 of 41 records
Cryptomus / Heleket (Xeltox Enterprises Ltd)
UK FCDO · Canada-registered payment/crypto service
The UK designated Xeltox Enterprises Ltd, listing Cryptomus and Heleket as associated names. A separate 2025 FINTRAC administrative penalty against Xeltox is an AML enforcement action, not a UK sanctions designation.
Entity note: UK listed legal entity: Xeltox Enterprises Ltd (RUS3755). Cryptomus and Heleket are aliases; do not double-count the same UK designation as two companies.
The UK designated OJSC Processing KG, a payments operator. Included as adjacent virtual-asset payment infrastructure, not strictly as a cryptocurrency exchange.
The EU added Rapira to the list of third-country financial and crypto-service entities subject to specified transaction restrictions.
Entity note: EU list published 23 July 2026; restriction effective 23 August 2026. These transaction restrictions are not the same as an OFAC SDN or an EU asset-freeze designation.
Aifory Pro (Sooty Ltd.) — EU listing
EU Council · EU Russia-related restrictive measures
The EU included Aifory Pro (Sooty Ltd.) in Annex XLV Part A.
Entity note: EU list published 23 July 2026; restriction effective 23 August 2026. These transaction restrictions are not the same as an OFAC SDN or an EU asset-freeze designation.
ABCeX (Nueva Cryptologia) — EU listing
EU Council · EU Russia-related restrictive measures
The EU listed ABCeX under its named legal entity, Nueva Cryptologia S.A.S. de C.V.
Entity note: EU list published 23 July 2026; restriction effective 23 August 2026. These transaction restrictions are not the same as an OFAC SDN or an EU asset-freeze designation.
WhiteBird
EU Council · EU Russia-related restrictive measures
The EU added the WhiteBird crypto-service name to Annex XLV Part A.
Entity note: EU list published 23 July 2026; restriction effective 23 August 2026. These transaction restrictions are not the same as an OFAC SDN or an EU asset-freeze designation.
NoOnecrypto INC. — NoOnes-related listing disputed
EU Council · EU Russia-related restrictive measures
Named entity: NoOnecrypto INC.
Brand names / aliases: NoOnecrypto INC. (listed name only; NoOnes association contested)
EU Regulation 2026/1848 names NoOnecrypto INC. in Annex XLV Part A. The NoOnes operator publicly said this listed entity was separate from its platform; its later wind-down notice said sanctions-related restrictions affected partners and transfers. The listing must not be assumed to establish the current legal operator of NoOnes.
Entity note: The EU legal text names NoOnecrypto INC., not the words “NoOnes platform.” NoOnes disputed an operating-entity connection in its official clarification; its subsequent wind-down cited sanctions-related restrictions. The legal relationship remains unresolved by these sources.
Tradex (Brightum LLC)
EU Council · EU Russia-related restrictive measures
The EU listed Tradex (Brightum LLC), a named crypto/financial-service entity, in Annex XLV Part A.
Entity note: EU list published 23 July 2026; restriction effective 23 August 2026. These transaction restrictions are not the same as an OFAC SDN or an EU asset-freeze designation.
Monease Ltd
EU Council · EU Russia-related restrictive measures
The EU listed Monease Ltd among third-country financial, crypto-asset and payment-service entities in Annex XLV Part A.
Entity note: EU list published 23 July 2026; restriction effective 23 August 2026. These transaction restrictions are not the same as an OFAC SDN or an EU asset-freeze designation.
BitPapa — EU listing
EU Council · EU Russia-related restrictive measures
The EU added BitPapa to Annex XLV Part A, following separate earlier U.S. and UK designations.
Entity note: EU list published 23 July 2026; restriction effective 23 August 2026. These transaction restrictions are not the same as an OFAC SDN or an EU asset-freeze designation.
Exnode / Exnode Pay (Arvix) — EU listing
EU Council · EU Russia-related restrictive measures
The EU included Exnode and Exnode Pay (Arvix) in the crypto and payments service Annex XLV Part A list.
Entity note: EU list published 23 July 2026; restriction effective 23 August 2026. These transaction restrictions are not the same as an OFAC SDN or an EU asset-freeze designation.
HTX (Huobi Global SA) — EU listing
EU Council · EU Russia-related restrictive measures
The EU listed EXMO Ltd in Annex XLV Part A in a separate action from the UK’s May designation of EXMO EXCHANGE LIMITED.
Entity note: EU list published 23 July 2026; restriction effective 23 August 2026. These transaction restrictions are not the same as an OFAC SDN or an EU asset-freeze designation.
The UK designated HUOBI GLOBAL S.A. under its Russia sanctions regime. OFSI has clarified that the UK asset-freeze restrictions apply to the HTX exchange through the ownership/control provisions. A separate EU transaction-restrictions listing followed in August 2026.
Payeer was added to Annex XLV Part A of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014; the entry became applicable on 25 November 2025. This is a transaction-restrictions listing, not an asset-freeze designation.
The UK designated the named crypto exchange company under its Global Human Rights sanctions regime, citing links to alleged Cambodia scam-centre abuses.
Designated for providing material support to the threat posed by ransomware actors; the first U.S. sanctions designation of a virtual-currency exchange.
Sanctions, fines and shutdowns: what is the difference?
Formal sanctions designation
An authority lists an identified person or entity under a sanctions regime, potentially restricting property or services. Some EU measures are transaction prohibitions rather than asset freezes.
Regulatory enforcement
A supervisor may issue warnings, fines, restrictions or licence decisions. These are not automatically sanctions designations.
Business closure
A platform may cease operations for business, legal or financial reasons without being on any sanctions list. See our separate closure tracker.
Evidence and methodology
Entries identify the issuing authority, dated action, named legal entity or service and an official source. The directory includes selected U.S. OFAC and UK designations and EU third-country financial/crypto-service transaction restrictions. These regimes differ in scope. It is not an exhaustive worldwide census. Where a trading brand and a designated company differ, the distinction appears in the record. Allegations in official releases are attributed to the issuing authority, not presented as a court finding.
Changes after the editorial review date may not be represented. Search the relevant authority’s current list for sanctions identifiers, aliases, jurisdictional scope, delistings, licences, exceptions and ownership/control effects. Do not assume every financial product or individual customer relationship connected to a brand is prohibited.
No. A civil fine, licensing warning, criminal allegation, enforcement order and formal sanctions designation are different legal events. The main directory records named sanctions designations and EU transaction-restrictions listings supported by official sources; administrative penalties appear separately as context.
Does this directory identify every sanctioned cryptocurrency exchange?
No. This is a curated, non-exhaustive historical timeline of documented platform and legal-entity restrictions under U.S., UK and EU regimes. Authorities update their lists; some named entities operate under different business names.
Are sanctions permanent?
Not necessarily. Authorities can amend or revoke designations, and licences and exemptions may apply. Always verify the current legal status of the exact person or entity in the authoritative live sanctions list.
Can I use Finlazo’s directory for sanctions screening?
No. This historical editorial directory is not a sanctions-screening service, compliance opinion or substitute for up-to-date OFAC, UK, EU and other applicable official lists, including ownership/control rules.